The AI Gender Gap Paradox
A case for fierce ambivalence by Mara Bolis, Oct. 27, 2025.
Several years ago, in an interview with Quartz, Mara Bolis argued that women are often mischaracterized as financially “risk-averse,” when a better description would be “risk aware.”
Instead of being celebrated as mindful stewards of financial resources, women are often perceived as being “too cautious.”
In another world—one where women define the terms—diligence would be seen as a strength rather than a perceived weakness.
Women often see flaws in systems they have not built, weigh the stakes carefully, and act accordingly.
The rise of generative AI, powered by large language models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, has been brisk and disorienting.
For many women, their gut response has been one of skepticism.
Author's summary: Women are skeptical about AI.
More News
- Landmark New Report Shows Canadian Lobbyists Represent Major Polluters Alongside Environmental Groups
- Why Hiring a Fishers Personal Injury Lawyer Is Key After a Car Accident, Slip, or Dog Bite | NorthPennNow
- West Indies ease past Bangladesh in first T20I
- Sean 'Diddy' Combs' Release Date Set
- Jensen Ackles back on 'Tracker' 3.2 to amp up the suspense
- The Casandra Cascade: Industrialisation Of Fear - FNArena.com
- Battlefield 6's Battle Royale Mode Is Called REDSEC, Is Free-To-Play, And Launches Tomorrow
- Rolls-Royce tests first high-speed methanol marine engine
- Three resilient UK multinationals global managers are excited about | Trustnet
- Comment | A spate of dealer anniversaries offers hope amid art market doomerism