Despite a High Court ruling that declared indefinite detention of refugees unlawful, the Australian Federal Government continues to send refugees back to Nauru without a clear timeframe for their release.
In November 2023, the High Court of Australia unanimously ruled that indefinite immigration detention is unlawful. This landmark decision overturned the 2004 precedent set by Al-Kateb v Godwin, stating that detention for the purpose of removal must be tied to a removal that is achievable within the reasonably foreseeable future.
"Where people are detained for the purpose of removal, that removal must be achievable in the reasonably foreseeable future."
Following the ruling, multiple legislative attempts have aimed to weaken judicial independence and continue restrictive detention policies. These include:
Politicians and media often highlight only the most serious cases, similar to the approach during debates over the Medevac legislation in 2019.
The policy of sending refugees back to Nauru persists amid concerns about human rights and the broader implications related to exile, climate impact, and regional solutions.
"Back to Nauru they go."
Exile to a vanishing shore: human rights, climate and the Nauru ‘solution’
Summary: The Australian Government’s continued practice of sending refugees to indefinite detention on Nauru violates the High Court’s ruling, reflecting ongoing struggles with legal and human rights challenges.
Would you like the text formatted for an article, blog post, or official report style?