Can anyone blame David Kampf for signing a four-year contract averaging $2.4 million per season to play hockey? It’s hard to fault him for securing such a deal.
Additionally, Kampf managed to include a limited no-trade clause in his contract, giving him some control over his future movements.
At this point, Kampf needs to accept that his options may be limited to playing with the Marlies or not playing at all.
"Is it in any way David Kampf’s fault for somehow managing to also pick up a limited no trade clause in the process?"
Author's summary: David Kampf's lucrative contract and no-trade clause highlight his strong negotiating position, but his future might still depend on playing in the minors or facing no playing time.